[Catalyst] Difference in running application via "perl -d" vs command line

[Daniel Hulme]

On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 03:45:26PM -0500, Lampert, Hugh wrote:
> whistles.  First I tried putting together an environment that would work
> well with CPAN but after getting lost in a lot of hairy NMAKE errors I
> dumped that plan.  Next I decided to use the PPM repository and the

This probably doesn't help if you have silly policies or other
restrictions, but even an outside chance of being helpful is worth
posting, I think.

At work I have to develop on Windows in order to do .NET stuff (yeah,
eeugh indeed). I installed Cygwin with Cygwin's gcc and Perl rather than
ActivePerl, and cpanp worked out of the box much more smoothly than I
ever managed to get PPM to work.

-- 
<Customer> Waiter, waiter! There's a fly in my soup!
<Waiter> That's not a bug, it's a feature.
http://surreal.istic.org/                         How's it going to end?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20070205/777f7ac0/attachment.pgp