[Catalyst] Catalyst vs Rails vs Django Cook off

[Daniel McBrearty]

you honestly can't  come to much of a conclusion about a test that
just hits the docroot over and over again, and sees how many
connections per second happen as a result. The test may say that one
aprticular aspect of RoR is quicker ... but it's not an aspect that
has a huge impact, given that the speed of most apps is affected by
what happens in the db layer.

After all, if you wanted you app to do this, you would just apache
serving a static file :-)\


Also, I noted that perrin's comment about using the -r option for
dprof hasn't been answered - maybe there was something else altogether
going on.


On 1/15/07, Octavian Rasnita <orasnita at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Carl Johnstone" <catalyst at fadetoblack.me.uk>
>
> >
> >> Is it true that Catalyst is so slow comparing
> >> with other frameworks?
> >
> > Does it matter?
>
> Of course it does.
>
> > If speed is so important, you should write your own custom httpd that does
> > exactly what you need in assembly language.
>
> It is too hard to write it in assembly, but it could be more easy to use
> Ruby on Rails instead if RoR is really faster.
> That's why I have asked.
>
> Now to say the truth, I won't use RoR because I don't know Ruby, but I want
> to know which are the advantages and disadvantages of Catalyst comparing
> with other frameworks.
>
> Octavian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: Catalyst at lists.rawmode.org
> Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>


-- 
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131