[Catalyst] The performance test of 6 leading frameworks

[J. Shirley]

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Mike Whitaker <mike at altrion.org> wrote:

>
> On 29 Feb 2008, at 16:21, dab at free.fr wrote:
>
> > hi
> >  I do not know if this test has already been posted on the list
>
> Several times.
>
> >  Why these bad performances ?
> >  http://www.alrond.com/en/2007/jan/25/performance-test-of-6-leading-
> > frameworks/
>
> Yes, it's slower. But let's just look at one figure there in a real
> world context:
>
> Catalyst: req/s 132.96
>
> That's:
>
> roughly 480,000 req/hour
> roughly 11 milion req/day
> roughly 330 million req/month
>
> If your site's doing that many requests a month, and you can't afford
> to move off one machine, your site's revenue model is seriously
> screwed. The last site I worked on that did a quarter billion plus a
> month did it on 40 servers!
>
> On top of that, of course, that presupposes all your users are
> accepting data as fast as you can throw it at them: rarely, if ever,
> is that the case. So, the question is, if the road you're on is
> limited to 70mph, does it matter if you're driving a car that'll do
> 110 or 230? Choose one that you're comfortable driving :)
> --
> Mike Whitaker - mike at altrion.org
>
>
I think that the focus should be on template engines, not the framework.

Code Irony has it right: http://www.codeirony.com/?p=3D9
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20080229/06f20=
6de/attachment.htm