[DBD-SQLite] Weird UTF-8 problem

Kenichi Ishigaki kishigaki at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 16:17:42 GMT 2009


Hi, Michael.

I don't think of any big changes that would affect your issue
(except for renaming "unicode" attribute to "sqlite_unicode"),
especially if the only difference is the version of DBD::SQLite
(and its library). Will you try every dev version between 1.25
and 1.26_06 to narrow down and see which version did it actually,
and also see if the lost always happens with the previous versions?

As for the second question, I hope so but we definitely need more
tests, especially for the new and fixed features (foreign keys and
other virtual table issues, various errors revealed recently,
transaction and rollback, etc), and more feedback by other players
including DBIC. I've been trying to convert some of the tests for
the sqlite library itself with limited success, but anyway, adding
some tests would help us much.

Best,

Kenichi


On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:44:05 +0100, Michael Lackhoff <michael at lackhoff.de> wrote:

>On 02.11.2009 14:05 Jonathan Yu wrote:
>
>> Have you consulted the changelog for DBD::SQLite and for upstream
>> sqlite versions? If this was a fix, take a diff between the two and
>> try to create a patch for it yourself.
>
>Well, I asked because I couldn't find anything myself. "Unicode" is
>mentioned twice in the changelog but both items don't look relevant.
>With regard to diffs I am very limited because I don't know any C so I
>won't be able to make any sense of it (at least of the sqlite and XS
>source).
>I was hoping the coder who made the relevant change reads this list and
>would remember.
>
>>> - is there a chance to make a new stable version? Then at least it is
>>> easier to meet the requirement.
>> I think that version 1.26 is under some testing before they want to
>> cut a real "stable" release. This testing is necessary to make sure
>> mass breakages don't happen as a result of the upload. Various people
>> need to make sure it doesn't break other things like DBIx::Class, etc.
>
>That goes without saying. I don't want a stable version "just for me".
>So let me rephrase my question: Do you think 1.26 has reached a maturity
>that a new stable release is possible in the not too distant future?
>
>-Michael
>
>_______________________________________________
>DBD-SQLite mailing list
>DBD-SQLite at lists.scsys.co.uk
>http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite




More information about the DBD-SQLite mailing list