[Dbix-class] RFC: DBIx-Class-Tree

[Aran Deltac]

Alan,

There is this fuzzy dividing line between what should and should not be
included in the core DBIC distro.  The general idea is that anything
that does not add external dependencies, and is a common paradigm that
people deal with on a regular basis, then it is a potential candidate
for inclusion.  Ordered was deamed worthy, and thus included.

The docs can be easly read by perldoc'ing the source at:

http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/branches/DBIx-Class-current/lib/DBIx/Class/Ordered.pm

Aran


On 4/3/2006, "Alan Humphrey" <alan.humphrey at comcast.net> wrote:

>
>
>> Oh, and I'd like to add that the first release of this will depend on
>> DBIx::Class 0.07000 shipping, so it will  most likely be a bit longer
>> than a week!  This is because DBIC:Tree::AdjecencyList::Ordered depends
>> on the new DBIC:Ordered module, which is not in 0.06000, but has been in
>> the DBIC subversion repo for a while.
>
>If nobody's massively offended by the idea I think I'd like to roll the
>::Ordered component into 0.06001 along with the SQLT deploy improvements in
>-current.
>
>What do people think of this idea?
>
>--
>
>I have no opinion about the module since I don't know what it does.  What is
>::Ordered and why should it be part of the core distribution?
>
>I'm not trying to be snarky, just trying to get a handle on what's going on.
>
>- Alan
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>List: http://lists.rawmode.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
>Wiki: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/
>IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
>SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/trunk/DBIx-Class/