[Dbix-class] Using Test::TestCoverage v0.08 with DBIC v0.08102

[Matt S Trout]

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:34:39PM +0200, Renee Bäcker wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Anthony Gladdish schrieb:
> > Has anyone else experienced this with Test::TestCoverage, or can anyone tell me if this should be happening and suggest a work around or solution such as "don't use Test::TestCoverage".
> 
> As a workaround, you can use this method:
> 
> test_coverage_except( $module, @subs );
> 
> test_coverage_except( 'DBIC::module', '<relationship>_rs', ... );
> 
> If you can send me a small test case, I can work on a better solution.

The problem is simple - we've started using Sub::Name::subname to name up
generated methods so they get correctly recognised as methods in the class
rather than imports.

Once we go to Moose you'll be able to test

$meta_method->isa('Class::MOP::Method::Generated')

to exclude. But that's not true yet. Suggestions very much welcome.

-- 
        Matt S Trout         Catalyst and DBIx::Class consultancy with a clue
     Technical Director      and a commit bit: http://shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
 Shadowcat Systems Limited
  mst (@) shadowcat.co.uk        http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/