[Dbix-class] Using Test::TestCoverage v0.08 with DBIC v0.08102
Matt S Trout
dbix-class at trout.me.uk
Mon May 11 17:39:43 GMT 2009
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 06:34:39PM +0200, Renee Bäcker wrote:
> Anthony Gladdish schrieb:
> > Has anyone else experienced this with Test::TestCoverage, or can anyone tell me if this should be happening and suggest a work around or solution such as "don't use Test::TestCoverage".
> As a workaround, you can use this method:
> test_coverage_except( $module, @subs );
> test_coverage_except( 'DBIC::module', '<relationship>_rs', ... );
> If you can send me a small test case, I can work on a better solution.
The problem is simple - we've started using Sub::Name::subname to name up
generated methods so they get correctly recognised as methods in the class
rather than imports.
Once we go to Moose you'll be able to test
to exclude. But that's not true yet. Suggestions very much welcome.
Matt S Trout Catalyst and DBIx::Class consultancy with a clue
Technical Director and a commit bit: http://shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Limited
mst (@) shadowcat.co.uk http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/
More information about the DBIx-Class