[Dbix-class] GOVERNANCE: Aggregation and conclusion

[Thomas Klausner]

Hi!

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:18:13AM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 07:22 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:43:31 Matt S Trout <mst at shadowcat.co.uk> wrote:
> > > Otherwise, I would suggest that you turn your plan into a full
> > > proposal,
> > 
> > TBH, I didn't even realise I was making a proposal until I saw the
> > results[1]. I was merely bringing up one of Dave's earlier
> > suggestions[2], which several others also seemed to like.
> > 
> > But, in that case, I propose:
> > 
> > - RIBASUSHI retains the current namespace, continuing to maintain and
> > tighten that code base. The aim would be a rock-solid module with a
> > very conservative rate of change and new features.
> > 
> > - A new namespace DBIx::Class2 is created, owned and operated by MST's
> > governance+core team proposal. Developers that want to create new
> > features do so in this namespace.

-1

I think a fork will not work. The "old" DBIC will stagnate, the "new" 
will not gain traction. Everybody loses.

Greetings,
domm


-- 
#!/usr/bin/perl                              http://domm.plix.at
for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}