[Dbix-class] IMPORTANT: A discussion of DBIC governance and future development

[Karen Etheridge]

> It is now much harder to advance either of these points.

Why?

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+dbic at rabbit.us>
wrote:

> This is not a response to the entirety of your email, but just one
> particular bit.
>
> On 10/05/2016 05:24 AM, Karen Etheridge wrote:
>
>>
>> 3) Since I had contracted Peter (via my employer) for particular patches
>> last
>> year, I didn't want to say or do anything that would distract him or
>> disrupt
>> that work, or become a conflict of interest with it; see also (2).
>>
>
> This was a really inappropriate piece of information to drop in a public
> forum for two reasons:
>
> 1) that work has not yet been completed
> 2) I have not actually billed your employer for anything
>
> It is now much harder to advance either of these points.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
> IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
> SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
> Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/
> dbix-class at lists.scsys.co.uk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/attachments/20161004/ece5d066/attachment.htm>