[Dbix-class] Alternative proposals proposal

[Darren Duncan]

I support either of these team proposals, assuming the prospective members 
agree. -- Darren Duncan

On 2016-10-13 1:42 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> It was suggested elsewhere I am against any "core team" plan. This is entirely
> false.
>
> As an *EXAMPLE* (I have not spoken to either of the poor saps below), a team
> similar to that would get several +1's from me:
>
> https://metacpan.org/author/FREW
> https://metacpan.org/author/HAARG
> https://metacpan.org/author/ILMARI
>
> If the number "5" is magical in some way, and diluting responsibility further is
> desirable: destabilize it a bit more, e.g.
>
> https://metacpan.org/author/FREW
> https://metacpan.org/author/HAARG
> https://metacpan.org/author/ILMARI
> https://metacpan.org/author/JROBINSON
> https://metacpan.org/author/SYSPETE
>
> As a community you seem to want prioritization of stability. Then why aren't you
> clamoring for a team that *mostly* leans towards stability *naturally*? I do not
> understand why settle for an illusion of a working group fully controlled by
> someone who demonstrably optimizes, and went on record intending to continue
> optimizing for progress for the sake of progress.