[html-formfu] disapearing rows useing DBIx::Class::HTML::FormFu svn

[Mario Minati]

On Saturday 10 November 2007 20:24:36 Carl Franks wrote:
> On 10/11/2007, Mario Minati <mario.minati at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 November 2007 11:25:27 Carl Franks wrote:
> > > On 09/11/2007, Mario Minati <mario.minati at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > just a word of caution to all of you useing the current svn of
> > > > DBIx::Class::HTML::FormFu!
> > >
> > > Yes, I'd suggest current trunk is for experimentation only.
> > > I've been making a lot of changes in the past week - and not all of
> > > them will be staying.
> > > I imagine none of the recent changes will be making it out to a new
> > > cpan release - they'll probably be moved to the new model class
> > > discussed the other day.
> >
> > Due to the removeal of the prefix and suffix stuff
> > DBIx::Class::HTML::FormFu I needed to switch to nested_name/nested_base
> > in my App.
> >
> > So I hope the next release will include nested_name and also the
> > Repeatable element that you have been working on the last days. :)
>
> It's probably best if you stick with the latest cpan release for now,
> and maybe make a new branch if you want to make any bugfixes that
> should be pushed to cpan.

No bugfixes for the moment.
Some improvments in the pipeline.

> I don't envisage any of the work I'm doing being released in
> DBIx-Class-HTML-FormFu.

You mean within the next few weeks, right?

> I've almost finished designing a standard for forms that will support
> all the different DBIC relationship types. Part of this requires the
> Repeatable block I've been working on this week - beware though, the
> API of that may change as well before I'm done - which is why I'd not
> posted anything about it yet ;)

As I try to keep up with the svn every day I also like to use the 
possibilities FormFu gains. Nevertheless I know that we are still in 
an 'early beta state'. And I'm willing to take the work following the API 
changes.

Greets,
Mario